Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizPick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizNo weekly quiz is published yet. Check the weekly page for the latest updates.
View Weekly PageFree practice for SSC, UPSC, Banking & Railway exams. No login required.
Answer: delimitation
106th Amendment (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023) implementation: (a) Requires first census post-enactment (census due 2021 delayed to 2024-25), (b) Followed by delimitation exercise to redraw constituency boundaries based on updated population data, (c) Then reservation implemented: 33% seats reserved for women, with rotation after each delimitation, (d) 1/3 of SC/ST reserved seats also reserved for women. Timeline uncertain due to census/delimitation delays; illustrates interplay between constitutional amendment, demographic data, and electoral geography.
Answer: 2019
Lokpal appointment timeline: (a) Act enacted: 2013, (b) Selection committee formation delayed due to lack of Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha (2014-2019), (c) First Lokpal appointed: March 2019 (Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose as Chairperson), (d) Operational challenges: Infrastructure, staff recruitment, rule framing, jurisdiction clarity. Illustrates gap between legislative enactment and institutional operationalization; highlights importance of political consensus and administrative preparedness for accountability mechanisms.
Answer: all of the above
GST Council functioning challenges: (a) Tax rates: States vs Centre disagreements on optimal rates for revenue vs growth, (b) Compensation: States demanded continuation of revenue guarantee post-2022; Centre cited fiscal constraints, (c) Classification: Whether items fall under 5%, 12%, 18%, 28% slabs affects revenue distribution, (d) Exemptions: Pressure to exempt essential items vs broaden tax base. Council decisions require 3/4 majority (Union 1/3 vote weight, States 2/3); consensus-building essential but challenging. Exemplifies cooperative federalism in practice with inherent tensions.
Answer: rules
DPDP Act, 2023: Framework legislation requiring detailed rules for operationalization. Implementation process: (a) Government drafts rules on: consent mechanisms, data fiduciary obligations, grievance redressal, Board procedures, (b) Public consultation on draft rules, (c) Final notification of rules, (d) Data Protection Board becomes operational, (e) Compliance timeline for entities. Current status (2024): Rules under consultation; Board not yet constituted. Illustrates gap between legislative enactment and effective implementation in complex regulatory areas.
Answer: 100
Constitutional amendments trajectory: (a) First Amendment (1951): Addressed land reforms, free speech restrictions, (b) Major amendments: 24th (amending power), 42nd (Mini-Constitution), 44th (post-Emergency corrections), 73rd/74th (local government), 86th (education right), 91st (anti-defection), 101st (GST), 103rd (EWS), 104th (SC/ST reservation extension), 105th (State OBC lists), 106th (women's reservation), (c) Over 105 amendments as of 2024. Demonstrates Constitution's adaptability; basic structure doctrine (Kesavananda) ensures core values protected despite frequent amendments.
Answer: reasonable
Keisham Meghachandra Singh case (2020): SC held: (a) Speaker must decide Tenth Schedule disqualification petitions within reasonable time (suggested 3 months), (b) Unreasonable delay undermines anti-defection law's deterrent effect, (c) Courts can intervene if delay causes irreversible harm (e.g., defector appointed Minister), (d) However, no fixed statutory timeframe in Tenth Schedule; Parliament urged to amend. Highlights implementation gap in anti-defection law; pending reforms to address Speaker bias and delayed decisions.
Answer: 44
Article 44 (Directive Principles): 'The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.' Aims to replace personal laws based on religion with common civil law on marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption. Debate: (a) Supporters: Promotes gender justice, national integration, (b) Critics: Threatens religious freedom, cultural diversity. Supreme Court has repeatedly urged implementation (Shah Bano, Sarla Mudgal cases), but political consensus lacking. Recent discussions in Parliament; no legislation yet.
Answer: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
New criminal laws (effective July 1, 2024): (a) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaces IPC: Adds new offences (mob lynching, terrorist acts), modifies definitions (sedition, murder), (b) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) replaces CrPC: Introduces zero FIR, electronic evidence, time-bound investigation, (c) Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) replaces Evidence Act: Recognizes electronic records as primary evidence, expands admissibility. Aims to decolonize criminal justice, incorporate technology, expedite trials. Implementation challenges: training, infrastructure, transitional issues.
Answer: 2026
Delimitation freeze: (a) 42nd Amendment (1976): Froze Lok Sabha/Assembly seats based on 1971 census till 2001 to encourage population control, (b) 84th Amendment (2001): Extended freeze till first census after 2026, (c) 87th Amendment (2003): Allowed delimitation based on 2001 census for Assembly constituencies only (not Lok Sabha). Rationale: Prevent penalization of States that controlled population growth; ensure political representation not distorted by demographic changes. Next delimitation expected post-2026 census.
Answer: expert
Demonetization case (January 2023): SC upheld 2016 demonetization (₹500/₹1000 notes) by 4:1 majority. Majority held: (a) Procedure under Section 26(2) RBI Act followed (RBI Board recommendation, Central Government notification), (b) Policy decision within executive domain, (c) No violation of Article 14/19/300A. Dissent (Justice Nagarathna): Noted lack of adequate expert consultation, disproportionate impact on informal sector, procedural flaws. Illustrates judicial deference to executive economic policy while highlighting accountability concerns.
Answer: information
ADR Case (February 2024): 5-judge Constitution Bench unanimously struck down Electoral Bonds Scheme (2018) and amended provisions of R.P. Act, IT Act. Held: (a) Anonymous political funding violates voters' right to know (implicit in Article 19(1)(a) - freedom of speech and expression), (b) Disproportionate impact on transparency and free/fair elections, (c) Potential for quid pro quo corruption, (d) Less restrictive alternatives available. Directed ECI to disclose bond donor-recipient details. Landmark transparency judgment reinforcing electoral democracy.
Answer: Anglo-Indian
104th Amendment (2019): (a) Extended SC/ST reservation in Lok Sabha (Article 330) and State Assemblies (Article 332) till 2030 (originally 10 years, extended repeatedly), (b) Omitted Article 331 (President's power to nominate 2 Anglo-Indian members to Lok Sabha) and Article 333 (Governor's power to nominate 1 Anglo-Indian member to State Assembly). Rationale: Anglo-Indian community's distinct identity has diminished; reservation based on social/educational backwardness principle. Controversial but constitutionally valid.
Answer: social audit
MGNREGA and social audit: Section 17 mandates social audit of all projects by Gram Sabha. Process: (a) Public verification of records, expenditure, beneficiary selection, (b) Gram Sabha discussion and approval, (c) Action on findings. Empowers citizens (especially marginalized) to monitor implementation, detect corruption, ensure accountability. Constitutional Morality requires governance to be participatory, transparent, and responsive to citizens' needs, not just top-down administration.
Answer: intergenerational
Environmental jurisprudence and Constitutional Morality: (a) Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991): Right to pollution-free water/air part of Article 21, (b) MC Mehta cases: Absolute liability for hazardous industries, (c) Intergenerational equity: Present generation holds environment in trust for future generations (principle in Sustainable Development). Constitutional Morality requires State to balance development with environmental protection, ensuring justice across generations.
Answer: accountable
RTI Act and accountable governance: (a) Enables citizens to access government information (Section 3), (b) Mandates proactive disclosure by public authorities (Section 4), (c) Provides appeal mechanism through Information Commissions (Sections 15-16), (d) Penalizes non-compliance (Section 20). Transparency reduces corruption, enables informed public participation, strengthens democratic accountability. Constitutional Morality requires State to facilitate, not obstruct, citizens' right to know.
Answer: separation of powers
Separation of Powers (implicit in Indian Constitution; not rigid like USA): (a) Legislature makes laws, (b) Executive implements laws, (c) Judiciary interprets laws and checks constitutionality. Constitutional Morality requires: (a) Courts don't usurp policy-making (judicial restraint), (b) Executive respects judicial orders, (c) Legislature doesn't override judicial review. Balance enables checks and balances while ensuring functional coordination for governance.
Answer: atomic energy and space
Lokpal Act, 2013: PM under jurisdiction but with safeguards: (a) No inquiry into allegations relating to international relations, external security, public order, atomic energy, space, (b) Inquiry requires approval of full bench of Lokpal, (c) Proceedings held in camera, (d) Frivolous complaints dismissed. Balances accountability of highest office with practical governance needs in sensitive strategic areas.
Answer: rule of law
Rule of Law (A.V. Dicey; embedded in Indian Constitution): Core elements: (a) Supremacy of law over arbitrary power, (b) Equality before law (Article 14), (c) Predominance of legal spirit (judicial review). Constitutional Morality operationalizes rule of law: executive actions must have legal basis, laws must comply with Constitution, courts must check excesses. Foundation of accountable, predictable governance.
Answer: 2014
Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014: Aims to: (a) Protect persons making public interest disclosures about corruption, misuse of power, criminal offences by public servants, (b) Provide mechanism for inquiry into disclosures, (c) Penalize victimization of whistle blowers. However, not fully notified due to debates on national security exemptions. Highlights tension between transparency/accountability and legitimate confidentiality in governance.
Answer: Third Schedule
Third Schedule: Contains forms of oaths/affirmations for constitutional functionaries. Article 75(4) (Union Ministers) and Article 164(3) (State Ministers) require oath as per Third Schedule. Oath includes: (a) Bear true faith to Constitution, (b) Uphold sovereignty and integrity of India, (c) Faithfully discharge duties, (d) Maintain confidentiality. Formalizes ethical commitment of public office holders to constitutional values.