GK Question

polity medium fill_blank

In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Supreme Court held that the procedure established by law under Article 21 must be fair, just, and reasonable, importing the concept of ______ due process from comparative constitutional law — a principle Constitutional Morality requires to protect individual dignity against arbitrary state action.

  1. substantive
  2. procedural
  3. economic
  4. political

Answer: procedural

Procedural due process and Constitutional Morality: (a) A.K. Gopalan (1950): Article 21 required only 'procedure established by law'; no substantive due process review, (b) Maneka Gandhi (1978): Overruled Gopalan; held procedure under Article 21 must be 'fair, just, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive; imported procedural due process from American constitutional law, adapted to Indian context, (c) Constitutional Morality application: (i) Enabled judicial review of executive action affecting life/liberty, (ii) Foundation for expanding Article 21 to include privacy, health, environment, livelihood, dignity, (iii) Requires state action to follow fair procedure: notice, hearing, reasoned order, appeal mechanism, (d) Balance: Courts don't substitute wisdom for administrators; check for procedural fairness, rationality, non-arbitrariness — Constitutional Morality guides calibrated oversight respecting separation of powers while protecting individual dignity. Illustrates judicial creativity: adapting foreign concepts to Indian constitutional text while respecting institutional boundaries.

Topic Constitutional Morality - Article 21 Procedural Due Process
Exam Relevance Procedural due process evolution frequently asked in UPSC and Judiciary exams