GK Question

polity medium fill_blank

Article 13 declares that laws inconsistent with or in derogation of Fundamental Rights shall be void, establishing the Supreme Court's power of ______ to examine constitutionality of legislation and executive action.

  1. legislative review
  2. judicial review
  3. executive oversight
  4. parliamentary scrutiny

Answer: judicial review

Judicial review foundation: (a) Article 13(2): State shall not make any law that takes away or abridges Fundamental Rights; any law made in contravention shall be void, (b) Judicial review power: Courts examine whether legislation/executive action violates FRs; if yes, declare it void/inoperative, (c) Evolution: (i) Early cases: Narrow review of legislative competence, (ii) Post-Maneka Gandhi: Expanded to procedural fairness, proportionality, (iii) Basic structure doctrine (Kesavananda): Review of constitutional amendments themselves, (d) Balance: Courts don't substitute policy wisdom; check for constitutional compliance, rationality, non-arbitrariness. Illustrates constitutional supremacy: Fundamental Rights protected against legislative/executive excess through independent judicial review. Foundation of rights enforcement architecture.

Topic Rights Expansion - Article 13 Judicial Review
Exam Relevance Judicial review fundamentals frequently asked in UPSC and Judiciary exams