GK Question

polity hard true_false

The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Preamble has evolved from viewing it as non-justiciable (Berubari, 1960) to recognizing it as part of the Constitution with interpretive and limiting functions (Kesavananda, 1973 onwards).

  1. True
  2. False

Answer: True

Preamble jurisprudence evolution: (a) Berubari Union case (1960): Preamble not part of Constitution; merely introductory, (b) Kesavananda Bharati (1973): Overruled Berubari; Preamble is part of Constitution, amendable but basic structure unamendable, interpretive aid, (c) Subsequent cases: Used Preamble to interpret FRs (privacy as part of liberty), strike down amendments violating secularism/federalism, affirm transformative vision. Illustrates living constitutionalism: judicial understanding adapts to societal needs while preserving core values.

Topic Preamble - Judicial Interpretation Evolution
Exam Relevance Judicial interpretation evolution question critical for UPSC Mains and Judiciary exams
More in polity Back to all questions