GK Question

polity hard mcq

How do Fundamental Rights in India differ from the Bill of Rights in USA regarding restrictions?

  1. Indian rights have no restrictions; US rights have many
  2. Indian rights have reasonable restrictions explicitly mentioned; US rights are absolute with judicially implied limitations
  3. Both have identical restriction frameworks
  4. US rights can be suspended during emergency; Indian rights cannot

Answer: Indian rights have reasonable restrictions explicitly mentioned; US rights are absolute with judicially implied limitations

Rights comparison: (a) India: Fundamental Rights (Articles 12-35) have explicit reasonable restrictions (e.g., Article 19(2)-(6) for freedoms) based on sovereignty, security, public order, morality, etc., (b) USA: Bill of Rights (First 10 Amendments) states rights absolutely; restrictions developed through judicial interpretation (e.g., 'clear and present danger' test for speech). Indian approach balances rights with social responsibilities; US approach emphasizes individual liberty with judicial balancing.

Topic Comparative Rights - Absolute vs Reasonable Restrictions
Exam Relevance Fundamental Rights comparison question critical for UPSC Mains and Judiciary exams