GK Question

polity hard fill_blank

In Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club v. Chander Hass (2007), the Supreme Court cautioned that judicial activism must not cross the line into ______, respecting separation of powers.

  1. judicial restraint
  2. judicial overreach
  3. legislative inaction
  4. executive discretion

Answer: judicial overreach

Divisional Manager (2007): SC cautioned: (a) Judicial activism necessary to protect rights, fill legislative vacuum, (b) But must not cross into judicial overreach (usurping legislative/executive functions), (c) Courts should exercise self-restraint, respect separation of powers, (d) Policy matters best left to elected branches unless constitutional violation. Balances judicial role in rights protection with democratic accountability.

Topic Judicial Activism and Separation of Powers - Divisional Manager Case
Exam Relevance Judicial activism vs overreach question critical for UPSC Mains and Judiciary exams