Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
Article 38's directive to eliminate inequalities based on religion, caste, sex, place of birth has guided affirmative action jurisprudence: reservation policies, anti-discrimination laws reflect that social justice requires not just formal equality but ______ measures to address historical disadvantage.
- economic
- substantive
- administrative
- military
Answer: substantive
Article 38 social justice and affirmative action: (a) Article 38 text: State shall strive to promote welfare of people by securing and protecting social order based on justice (social, economic, political); minimize inequalities in income; eliminate inequalities in status, facilities, opportunities based on religion, caste, sex, place of birth, or otherwise, (b) Substantive equality rationale: (i) Historical disadvantage: Caste discrimination, gender inequality, regional disparities require differential treatment (affirmative action) to achieve real equality, (ii) Structural barriers: Formal equality insufficient if social, economic barriers persist; substantive measures address root causes of inequality, (iii) Transformative potential: Affirmative action enables marginalized groups to participate fully in social, economic, political life; advances constitutional vision of inclusive society, (c) Affirmative action operationalization: (i) Reservation policies: Articles 15(4), 16(4) enable reservation for SC/ST/OBC in education, employment; Indra Sawhney (1992) upheld with creamy layer exclusion, (ii) Anti-discrimination laws: SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 criminalizes caste-based violence, discrimination; enforces substantive equality, (iii) Gender justice: Laws against discrimination, violence; policies for women's empowerment advance Article 38 goals, (d) Applications: (i) Sub-classification within SCs: Davinder Singh (2024) permits States to sub-classify SCs for equitable benefit distribution, operationalizing substantive equality, (ii) Intersectional approach: Recognizing compounded disadvantage (caste + gender, caste + disability) enables targeted policies for most marginalized, (iii) Data-driven policy: Disaggregated data on SC/ST outcomes essential for evidence-based affirmative action, monitoring progress, (e) Challenges: (i) Implementation gaps: Weak enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, delays in justice limit effectiveness; require institutional strengthening, (ii) Social attitudes: Persistent discrimination requires accompanying social education, community engagement, not just legal reform, (iii) Balancing act: Ensuring affirmative action promotes inclusion without reverse discrimination requires evidence-based design, periodic review, (f) Illustrates transformative social justice: Article 38 operationalized through substantive equality measures; balance between formal equality, affirmative action, social change essential for realizing constitutional vision of inclusive, just society.