Create a custom practice set
Pick category, difficulty, number of questions, and time limit. Start instantly with your own quiz.
Generate QuizGK Question
The basic structure doctrine has evolved through judicial interpretation. Which statement best captures this evolution?
- Basic structure features were exhaustively listed in Kesavananda and cannot be expanded
- Basic structure is a living concept; courts identify core features through contextual interpretation while preserving constitutional identity
- Basic structure applies only to Fundamental Rights, not other constitutional provisions
- Basic structure can be amended by simple majority if Parliament so decides
Answer: Basic structure is a living concept; courts identify core features through contextual interpretation while preserving constitutional identity
Basic structure evolution: (a) Kesavananda Bharati (1973): Propounded basic structure doctrine; identified core features but did not exhaustively list them, (b) Subsequent elaboration: (i) Minerva Mills (1980): Added balance between FRs-DPSP as basic structure, (ii) SR Bommai (1994): Added secularism, federalism as basic structure, (iii) Puttaswamy (2017): Recognized privacy, dignity as part of basic structure, (iv) NJAC (2015): Reinforced judicial independence, separation of powers as basic structure, (c) Living concept rationale: (i) Constitutional identity: Core values defining Indian constitutionalism evolve through democratic practice, judicial interpretation, (ii) Contextual application: Courts identify basic features through contextual interpretation, not rigid checklist, (iii) Preservation, not stagnation: Basic structure preserves constitutional identity while permitting adaptation to contemporary challenges, (d) Applications: (i) Emerging challenges: Digital rights, climate justice, intersectional equality assessed against basic structure principles, (ii) Judicial restraint: Courts identify basic features cautiously, respecting parliamentary amendment power within constitutional limits, (iii) Democratic dialogue: Basic structure doctrine enables dialogue among branches on constitutional evolution, (e) Illustrates living constitutionalism: Basic structure as evolving concept; courts identify core features through contextual interpretation while preserving constitutional identity, enabling adaptation without abandonment of foundational values.